88 SA Flyer Magazine
W
hile AOPA South
Africa has had
success in keeping
the CAA’s and other
parties’ excesses
in check, some of these impediments to
the development and survival of GA keep
rearing their heads, refusing to die.
Most of these little monsters have
little or no basis in promoting safety or
private aviation. When mulling over the real
motivations behind them, the old adage
‘follow the money’ comes to mind.
R10,000 FINES
Although there have been some
regulatory changes to Part 185 of the
Regulations, these only seem to entrench
an extremely unconstitutional and
unproductive approach to enforcement.
When Miller wrote about this subject
in August 2013, CAA inspectors on
‘roadshows’ were darkly telling quivering
pilots that “CAA Director Poppy Khoza
has all the powers of a magistrate.” That’s
nonsense. As has been decided in case
after case in South Africa, there is a
clear separation of powers between the
executive, the legislature and the judiciary.
Nevertheless, the CAA persists in trying
to legislate by ignoring the limits on its
power to regulate, and continues to mislead
hapless victims of their enforcement
process that the Director has powers to
adjudicate over what are dened as criminal
offences – without respecting the rights of
accused persons. Essentially, CAA is still
trying to be administrator, parliament and
kangaroo court all in one.
A few determined individuals have
taken matters to the High Court, which
has in turn been critical of CAA’s failure to
follow the correct procedures in attempting
to penalise individuals. The doctrine of
‘just culture’ has also been poured into the
mix and, at this stage, has only served to
confuse matters further. Just culture and
criminal procedure are conceptually similar.
Both only permit punishment of an offender
if he or she has wilfully broken the rules or
been unacceptably negligent.
Most of the enforcement actions that
have crossed AOPA’s desk are trivial or
justiable transgressions, if indeed they are
transgressions at all. Yet, they all start with
demands for payment of R10,000 or more.
None of them would be likely to be enforced
by the courts.
It is essential that anyone receiving an
enforcement notice from CAA obtain advice
from either a practitioner or from AOPA
before making any kind of representation
or payment. Payment of any fee or ne, or
making plaintive representations, will only
be detrimental to your case.
CORPORATE OPERATIONS
We reported in September 2013 that
AOPA Europe was successful in preventing
EASA from passing regulations regarding
aireld limitations for turbine aircraft used
for business purposes. An example was
given of a member of AOPA Germany
who would have been required to y to
his destinations in a single-engine piston
aircraft rather than the Piaggio Avanti he
had been using extensively for many years
without mishap. EASA saw the irrationality
AOPA BRIEFING
Back in 2013, when
the late John Miller
was writing a similar
article, we covered a
number of unworkable
proposals, regulations and
procedures which have
been a thorn in the side
of general aviation for a
considerable length of
time.
THE ZOMBIE
REGULATIONS
Chris Martinus ‒ Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association – South Africa
According to AOPA, the
Director shouldn't have
powers to adjudicate
over what are defined as
criminal offences.